Brandon Select Board Meeting
January 13, 2010
NOTE: These are unapproved minutes, subject to amendment and/or
approval at the subsequent board meeting.
In
Attendance:
Richard Baker, Kellie Martin, Mitch Pearl, Devon Fuller
Also
in Attendance:
Keith Arlund,
Wayne Rausenberger, Jim Leary, Maurice Racine, Chris Brickell, Lynn Orth, Bill
Orth, Jim Leary, June Kelly, Linda Stewart, Maurice Racine, Tina Wiles, Lee
Kahrs, George Reilly, Ethan Swift, Judy Eve Brown, Kevin Blier
1.
Call to order
The
meeting was called to order at
7:00PM by Vice-Chair Richard Baker.
a) Agenda Adoption
Motion by Mitch Pearl/Kellie Martin
to adopt the agenda as presented. The motion passed unanimously - 3 to zero.
3.
Fiscal
a) Warrant - January 11, 2010 - $48,468.80
Motion by Mitch
Pearl/Kellie Martin to approve the January 11th warrant in the amount
of $48,468.80. The motion passed unanimously - 3 to zero.
Kellie
Martin advised there is no school next Monday. The 6th grade students
are participating in the DARE program, which is being taught by OV's school
resource officer. The next PTO meeting is scheduled for Monday, February 1st
at 7:00PM and they will be discussing the 5th and 6th
grade fund raising. Both major fund raisers have seen a decrease this year and
in an effort to boost the funds, there will be a Schwan's truck at Neshobe
School from 5:00PM to 7:00PM on February 1st, with a portion of the
sales going to the school.
Jim
Leary reported Neshobe School's proposed budget has an increase of less than
1%. Articles the board will be bringing before the voters at town meeting will
be to authorize the Neshobe School Board to reserve funds for ongoing
maintenance and to authorize the use of funds received from the state for
payment of the performance contract.
5. Town Manager’s Report
Keith
Arlund stated Mr. Schmelzenbach provided a brief report regarding the potential
work for the next construction season. He noted this area is being incorporated
into the development of the budget and $50,000.00 has been included for
resurfacing, however, no decisions have been made as to specific projects for
the balance of the bond funds that are not pertaining to the Segment 6 project.
He noted the department will be working on a bridge on Wheeler Road and the
Maple/Union Streets sidewalk project will continue with funding from a grant.
Several culverts will also be replaced during the summer construction project.
The Backyard Project right-of-way is being re-evaluated for some small changes
and it is hopeful to have the ramp from Kennedy Park to the municipal parking
lot done this summer.
Devon
Fuller asked when a firm project list will be available. Mr. Arlund advised Mr.
Schmelzenbach has a list of potential projects and once the budget is approved
by the voters, he will develop a work plan. The board has made the decision on
specific projects and the board will establish a priority for the projects.
Devon
Fuller stated as far as park maintenance, is pruning the trees under Public
Works department. Mr. Arlund advised that tree maintenance is generally along
roadways for overhanging and there may be some overlap between the two. Park
maintenance as far as mowing the lawns is under the Buildings and Grounds
department, which is a subset of the Public
Works department as a cost center for these items. Mr. Fuller questioned who he
should contact with regard to these types of requests. Mr. Arlund advised that
people can contact either Tom Schmelzenbach or him, which will generate a work
order by Elaine and will be forwarded to the appropriate department.
Maurice
Racine asked if the Backyard Project has been approved and what is the status of
the state funding. Keith Arlund stated the town has provided a number of
invoices and they are contingent upon approval by the state. He noted Curtis
Johnson is reviewing this issue. Mr. Racine asked if they can do the alley way
and Mr. Arlund noted he will speak with Tom Schmelzenbach tomorrow and see if he
can get this information from the state. Jim Leary asked how much the grant was
initially for the Backyard Project. Keith Arlund stated he does not remember the
figure, however, about $50,000.00 has been spent of the grant money, which
includes the match. Keith Arlund stated he does not have the figure off the top
of his head, but there have been changes made and some items have been paid.
Maurice Racine stated $10,000.00 had been spent for engineering. Jim Leary
stated as inflation goes up, the funds will pay for less. Mr. Racine would like
to hear there is a final design and if it has gone through right-of-way process,
it should have gone through design. Jim Leary stated he has brought this subject
up during the last two town meetings and he does not see why it is taking so
long. Kellie Martin stated there has been difficulty getting answers back from
the state and this is not the first time the town has submitted for the
easement. Richard Baker stated this is a long-standing issue and the board will
expect a full report from the staff at the January 25th meeting and
this information should be available to the public the Friday before the meeting
as well. Mr. Baker stated it is reasonable to get a status report on this
subject, however, enhancement grants tend to take on a life of their own and he
agrees with Mr. Racine that it is time to get closure on this item.
Mr.
Arlund reported in the list of possible projects for the next fiscal year, it
was discussed to possibly do some construction on the upper part of Union
Street; however, it is unknown whether the state will provide any funding.
Relative to Bridge 114 near the town office, Mr. Arlund advised he has received
one quote and he spoke with Mr. Schmelzenbach concerning the solicitation of
other bids for this project.
Richard
Baker stated as part of the Transportation Act, the state is soliciting
municipalities who can provide a 20% match and locally manage the construction
of bridges, which would include Bridge 114. Mr. Schmelzenbach had recommended
including $10,000.00 for an engineering study for FY2011 and if a reasonable
price quote can be obtained, the board should authorize this item as soon as
possible to get to the head of the line for the grant.
8.
Planning Commission Report – Interim BLUO Amendments
Ethan
Swift stated the Planning Commission met on January 4th and voted to make
amendments to the Brandon Land Use Ordinance (BLUO) that included Section 112
regarding compliance with state regulations and Section 5d that refers to
nonconforming uses. The Planning Commission motioned to forward this plan on to
the Select Board, which had previously been submitted but not adopted by the
Select Board in 2007. Mr. Swift stated the Commission determined the best
process to vent the changes is under 234 VSA Subsection 2415, given the fact the
Planning Commission will be working on the revision of the existing ordinance
for a period of time. Richard Baker concurred with this issue noting there are a
couple of economic development projects that would benefit from amending the
bylaws, which is long overdue. Mr. Baker suggested warning a hearing for
February 8th to provide the public an opportunity to weigh in on the
amendment and provides the 15 days to put the package together and make it
available for public review. Mr. Baker also suggested placing this item as a
bulleted agenda item for the February 8th meeting. Ethan Swift stated
the Planning Commission looks at these as more of stop gap measures.
Ethan
Swift stated the Committee is in the process of revising the Land Use Ordinance,
however, some amendments are more time sensitive and need to be considered in
the near-term because the time involved in revising the existing Land Use
Ordinance may take another year.
Mitch
Pearl stated when an area is zoned for particular uses, those items are
grandfathered. The problem occurs when a grandfathered use goes out of business;
the zoning would then revert back to what it should be in that area. The policy
of the state of Vermont is if there is going to be zoning; all non-conforming
uses should be phased out. If there are problems in the zoning area, the map can
be redrawn. The zoning ordinance indicates if a particular non-conforming
business does not reopen in a year, it loses its grandfathered status. In a down
economy, it may take longer than a year to reopen a business and the reality is
although the business is grandfathered, it is in the town's best interest for it
to remain, such as a neighborhood store. This change would extend the period of
time to four years to retain the grandfathered status. In a down economy, this
would stymie economic development if this change were not made. Ethan Swift
stated the Committee also reviewed other ordinances concerning non-conforming
uses and the Committee decided to go with the four year time frame. Mitch Pearl
stated it is not automatic and a permit would be required for a conditional use.
Richard Baker stated this is a recommendation brought forth by the Planning
Committee and supported by the Select Board.
Motion by Mitch
Pearl/Kellie Martin to approve the warning of a hearing to discuss the Land Use
Ordinance for February 8th at 7:00PM. The motion passed
unanimously - 4 to zero.
Ethan
Swift stated the language in VSA 24 4415 indicates the municipal body can
approve this and the enabling language is there to consider it. Richard Baker
stated this will have to be warned 15 days prior to the hearing and if the
information is obtained for the next Select Board meeting on January 25th,
it can be discussed.
9.
Old Other Business
Mitch
Pearl suggested scheduling the budget workshop just prior to the January 25th
meeting, with the goal of adopting the budget at this meeting. It was a
consensus of the board to schedule a budget workshop meeting for 6:00PM on
January 25th. Richard Baker stated this has been a difficult
budget and it is the intent to have a budget that is similar to the year before
last. It was noted the deadline to post the warning is January 31st.
It is the intent of the board to also hold a budget workshop for next week as
well, once the Board Chair has returned.
Richard
Baker stated relative to the grant application for the path at the recreation
field, there is an indication for the Select Board to expend a local match for
this project in the amount of $20,000.00. There was a letter of support provided
by the Town Manager for this project. June Kelly stated the Recreation Committee
provided answers concerning the pavilion building and it is hoped this is an
issue for Public Works. Ms. Kelly advised they have met with the Youth
Conservation Corp. and they are in support of the trail project. The Recreation
Committee, with the help of Tom Schmelzenbach, have put together a draft for the
trail. They have received three bids for actual costs and a potential fourth bid
may be received. Some contractors would be willing to do in-kind and it would
cost about $52,000.00 to do the trail. There is also another mini-grant through
VTrans that would be for $8,000.00. Ms. Kelly stated with the other pieces
depending on the final draft and design, all of the funds and proposal would be
doable. The grant award is the contingent part of it and the Committee will have
the grant application submitted by the deadline, with the review committee
meeting in mid-February and the grant awards provided mid-May. The Recreation
Committee is asking for the Select Board's support.
Richard
Baker asked if a letter is sufficient from the Town Manager authorizing the
Committee to proceed and Ms. Kelly stated that this would suffice. Mr. Baker
asked if the town's participation is proportional to the total project or is it
$20,000.00 regardless of the amount of funds received from the grant. June Kelly
stated the $20,000.00 will make the project doable. The grant parameters will
provide up to 80%, which means the town would only have to come up with
$5,000.00 for the grant. The trail is going to cost about $52,000.00 and the
actual cost is going to be more because the in-kind is going to be another
$20,000.00. The only other contingency is a small cost for the final design and
Ms. Kelly noted the Committee may be able to get that in-kind. The maximum grant
is being requested, however, it is uncertain if the full amount will be given.
Some pieces of the trail have been taken out. When the contractors did the site
visit, it was determine it would be too costly and some of the project was
backed out. The Committee is trying to be ADA-compliant and they are trying to
create a multi-use pass. The Committee is confident that they will get the grant
and raise the remaining money from the residents of the town. Ms. Kelly stated
a survey of the community was done and they are very interested in a recreation
path. Ms. Kelly provided a map of the project for the Select Board's review.
Motion by Kellie
Martin/Mitch Pearl to designate an amount not to exceed $20,000.00 towards the
Estabrook Park Trail Project and to authorize the Town Manager to sign a letter
on behalf of the Select Board relative to this project.
Tina
Wiles stated they have made inquiries to all of the state departments and they
are trying to do the least amount of impact to the wet lands. She noted the
reason they were considering going through them was for ADA compliance. The
bridge would cost in the $40,000.00 range and this will be considered in the
future. Ms. Wiles stated there are no costs for easements and the path would
connect to the Brandon Training School roads and to the sidewalk on the east
side of Route 7.
Devon
Fuller asked if the town can provide in-kind services and June Kelly stated Tom
Schmelzenbach has volunteered his services, which would be used.
Richard
Baker stated this has a minuscule impact on the budget and it is available as a
carry-over from previous recreation infrastructure. He would like to commend
June Kelly and Tina Wiles on all their hard work, as they have put a tremendous
amount of effort into this project.
The
motion passed unanimously - 4 to zero.
Tina
Wiles stated the Recreation Advisory Committee met last night and Ms. Wiles read
the following statement:
"The
Brandon Recreation Advisory Committee "BRAC" wants to ensure that the Town of
Brandon is providing and encouraging the safest possible recreational and other
programs for its adults, youth, and children. The Brandon Town Plan is a
statement of how the Town's future development should proceed in order to
promote health, safety and welfare of its citizens. In addition, the Town Plan
specifically states that its objectives are to provide a range of year-round
recreational activities and opportunities for people of all ages and to continue
and maintain and expand recreational facilities and the Town's Recreation
Department programs. The Town Plan also carries recommendations to support BRAC
in the efforts to plan for and promote recreational opportunities, develop a
capital budget for the Recreation Department that will continue to seek grant
funding for programs and facilities improvements, provide appropriate staffing
to support recreational programs and opportunities for residents of all ages,
support the Town Hall revitalization, and support the Boys and Girls Club, and
pursue opportunities to construct paths and trails for multi-use recreation,
etc.
Tonight representatives of BRAC come before you, the Select Board, to discuss
the Town of Brandon's commitment to its mission statement as set out in the Town
Plan, and the desires by BRAC to carry out the Town Plan objectives and
recommendations relating to recreation.
BRAC
agrees that we have three top priority items as we stand before you tonight.
The first priority is receiving the grant match funds requested in connection
with the Estabrook Park Multi-Use Recreation Path. We appreciate the support of
our request by the Select Board and its commitment to bringing this path to
fruition.
The
second priority is the funding of a full-time Recreation Coordinator position.
This is the same request we submitted to the Select Board for consideration in
August. It was our understanding that the funding of such a position would be
looked into. To date, such a position has not been instituted or funded. The
Recreation Department continues to be run on a volunteer basis by a few of the
BRAC members in addition to a very part time staff person. Although this on the
surface appears to be working for the Town, it is not a long-term solution. We
also do not believe that the solution is to move all recreation programs to the
Boys and Girls Club of Brandon. We want to reiterate that BRAC is fully
supportive of the Boys and Girls Club of Brandon and has and will continue to
work collaboratively with the Club on programming. I think we can all agree
that what the Boys and Girls Club of Brandon provides to our local youth is
outstanding and we should certainly continue to support their mission and
programming. However, the Club is not currently providing the same programming
that the Brandon Recreation Department is provide to Brandon adults and youth
alike. I think it important to recognize that the programs that the Brandon
Recreation Department have offered and continue to offer are done well.
Especially if you realize, which most residents don't, that since the departure
of the former recreation director in May of last year the department has been
run almost completely by volunteers. I can tell you with confidence that the
programs offered are financially self-sufficient programs. Imagine how awesome
the Recreation Dept. and its programs would be if we funded the department to an
appropriate level, hired a full time, qualified recreation coordinator, instead
of funding the Recreation Dept. to a level that makes it simply functional. The
residents of the Town of Brandon deserve a fully funded recreation department.
Including a full-time recreation coordinator according to the job description
this committee has previously provided to the Select Board.
At
this point, the BRAC respectfully request that the Select Board in its
commitment to the residents of Brandon to carry out the purpose of the Town
Plan, commit funds to the Recreation Department in the 2010-2011 Budget.
Specifically, BRAC requests that the Select Board enter a budget line item for a
Recreation Coordinator salary up to $42,000.00, and allocate $8,700.00 to
support the summer camp programs offered by the Boys and Girls Club of Brandon.
However, BRAC does not support allocating funds to the Boys and Girls Club of
Brandon if it diminishes the value of funds made available to fund the
Recreation Coordinator position and/or the Recreation Dept. BRAC has also
recently become aware that the Boys and Girls Club of Brandon has a petition for
an appropriation of funds from the Town of Brandon in the amount of $10,000. We
are concerned that the Town of Brandon may provide funds to the Boys and Girls
Club of Brandon in an amount of $18,700.00 while at the same time only funding
the Recreation Department with $30,000 of funds. Especially if the funds are
granted to the Club out of the Recreation Department Budget. The remaining
$12,000.00 would not be sufficient to fund a Recreation Department.
The
third priority is assuring the future of the Recreation Department is
protected. We feel strongly that if the Recreation Department is not properly
funded in the next fiscal year budget its future is in question. Contracting
out the functions of the Recreation Department is not the answer and we believe
it is not what the residents of the Town of Brandon are desirous of. Without a
commitment to the Recreation Department, the future of BRAC is also at stake.
If the Town does not support the Recreation Department then the question is -
does it really support the purpose, efforts and recommendations of BRAC. We ask
you, members of the Select Board, to make a commitment to the Recreation
Department and BRAC by responding to our requests for funding in the 2010-2011
budget."
Richard
Baker stated he does not think it would be productive to have an extensive
conversation tonight, but he would request input from the public this evening.
Mitch Pearl stated there may not be as many members of the Recreation Committee
at the budget meeting and if there are specific questions, it would be
appropriate to ask at this time. Mr. Baker stated the Board has requested the
town staff to reduce the budget and this evening's discussions are adding
additional expenses which would increase the tax rate by 3 to 4 cents. Mr. Pearl
stated in terms of the substantive recommendations, it is best for the board to
understand them and he questioned the Committee's reasoning for a full-time
director. It was noted the Committee does not feel a half-time director would be
acceptable. Mr. Pearl stated it would be helpful to clarify the Committee's
reason for not making the recommendation to contract more services to the Boys
and Girls Club. Kevin Blier stated from the Committee's experience over the last
year, it is felt the recreation programs work better with a full-time person
coordinating the various efforts. It is not apparent to most how much effort
goes into doing the programs, but it has become clear to the Committee that a
part-time person would give us what we pay for and it would be difficult to find
a quality person on a part-time basis. The Committee is asking the Select Board
to level fund the budget from two years ago and build the program better than
before. June Kelly stated the quality and control in contracting out services is
difficult. There are governance and oversight issues in this case as well.
Maurice Racine questioned whether there is any redundancy between the Recreation
Department and the Boys and Girls Club. He does feel that a full-time recreation
director is needed. Tina Wiles stated they have been collaborating with the Boys
and Girls Club to not overlap activities and the two groups compliment each
other. Ms. Wiles stated she has recently had a conversation with the student
support services person at Neshobe and he is asking the Recreation Department to
consider taking over basketball next year. She stated they do not have enough
staff in the Recreation Department, also noting the department is primarily
being run on a volunteer basis. She stated it is very time consuming to do
program development and if there was a full-time Recreation Director, the
Committee could then concentrate on grant writing. Richard Baker questioned if
the proposal is in lieu of seeking to work with other groups. Tina Wiles stated
they are working with the Boys and Girls Club, the library and the Friends of
the Town Hall in an effort to work as a community. Mitch Pearl stated Ms. Wiles
alluded that a Recreation Director would be able to take over organizational
programs and town hall scheduling, making sure there were not conflicts and in
this capacity it would provide opportunities for the program to branch out. Ms.
Wiles stated in looking at a coordinator position, they tried to focus more on
administration and it is her understanding that the Recreation Director did
programming, as well as the activities. Devon Fuller stated with the Recreation
Department working collaboratively with the Boys and Girls Club; the Recreation
Department would do the adult programming and start to take care of the Town
Hall scheduling, which does not sound like a full-time position. Mr. Blier
stated there is much management time to do sports and the role of the Boys and
Girls Club and the role of the Recreation Department do not have a lot of cross
over. Kellie Martin stated that cross over and collaboration should not be used
interchangeably. There are many other organizations the Committee is
collaborating with to insure non-duplication, to increase participation and to
reduce costs, which is very appropriate and worthwhile to everyone. Devon Fuller
stated he is not sure the Boys and Girls Club cannot be the answer to
recreation, as they having staffing and they are discussing additional staffing.
Linda Stewart stated perhaps this position could be hired through the Boys and
Girls Club, as another full-time town employee would be not only salary, but
also benefits. Jim Leary asked if the $42,000.00 included all of the costs and
Richard Baker stated the costs could be as high as $77,000.00, if the person was
eligible for family coverage through the health insurance plan. Lynn Orth stated
these are very difficult times and we have seen our personal incomes decrease
and it is not appropriate for additional costs to be added; though she does
support concept. Bill Orth stated these times require some difficult choices to
be made, with the lay off of teachers and increased percentages for health
insurance. Maurice Racine stated there seems to be a question of what the
Recreation Department and the Boys and Girls Club do and suggested having a
listing what each entity does. Richard Baker stated we are not talking about
either/or; this would be in addition to the Boys and Girls Club.
Larry
Bayle of the Boys and Girls Club stated they can do baseball and softball; and
is one of the things they do well in Rutland. Mr. Bayle provided a written
recommendation to the Board members. He stated for the rest of the year, there
would be a Recreation Coordinator hired and there would be a Summer Camp
Coordinator. Mr. Bayle stated he will entertain any questions the Board may
have. In terms of the supplies, it is hoped there would be no increased costs to
the town or the Boys and Girls Club. Mr. Blier stated there would be no
Recreation Department once the town hands over equipment assets to the Boys and
Girls Club. Mr. Blier also raised the question about the validity of devoting 10
hours a week to those functions and he questions if that would be realistic. Mr.
Bayle stated the people of Brandon want a quality program. Mitch Pearl stated we
want a good Recreation Department for the town that the town can afford.
Relative to the issue of equipment, Mr. Pearl is not sure what the issue is
about equipment. Mr. Blier stated there is a value to the equipment and if
there is a collaborative issue, the sports equipment should not be turned over
to the Boys and Girls Club. Mr. Bayle stated the Recreation Committee would be
the steering committee for the recreation in the town; with the Boys and Girls
Club and Recreation Committee working together to develop the programs. He
stated the town of Randolph had instituted this several years ago and is working
well. Maurice Racine stated that a full-time recreation director is a full-time
scheduler and is on site to supervise the recreation, but relies heavily on
volunteers. He asked how many full-time staff people would be at the Boys and
Girls Club. Mr. Bayle stated there would be 6 full-time employees during the
summer with 5 being year-round, plus 2 administrators. Mr. Bayle stated there
could also be recreation programs for adults and seniors as well. Jim Leary
stated quality recreational programming is important to our teens, as they are
exposed to risks and money going to recreation is money well spent. On the
economic development side, Devon Fuller stated recreation is an important asset
as people will want to come to a community that has a vibrant recreation
department. Mr. Bayle asked what the time line would be relative to marketing
purposes and timing purposes, particularly for summer programs. Kellie Martin
stated the board will have a budget to propose to the voters, but the board
cannot say prior to town meeting what they will spend until the budget is
approved. Mitch Pearl stated when we adopt a budget and advocate it to the
voters, it will have a number in it for recreation and in fairness to everyone
who cares about this issue, the board needs to make a decision whether the
budget is put together with either hiring a Recreation Director or moving
forward with the Boys and Girls Club. He stated the budget is difficult and if
the board is going to present the budget in a positive way to the voters, they
need to know what is being proposed. He would imagine the board will probably
know what they want to do with recreation prior to town meeting. Devon Fuller
stated everyone needs to have an idea, as the summer programs need to be planned
early and the board should try to have an answer for everyone. Kellie Martin
stated the budget has to be ready for warning by January 31st and
items will not be able to be moved on until the budget is approved. Devon Fuller
stated it is important to provide the people with a definitive answer and it
sounds like they will get an indication by early February. Mitch Pearl stated if
it is decided to hire a recreation Director, it will reflect that and we will
start advertising for someone. He stated if a figure is included in the budget
for contracted services, it would be fair to say that we are going to contract
out the recreation activities. Mr. Pearl stated there will be a direction once
the budget is determined.
Richard
Baker stated relative to the Economic Development Committee, he advocates
keeping the adhoc committee for a short time longer. Devon Fuller did not
believe this would be required, as the Executive Committee will provide this
service.
Richard
Baker felt the subcommittees and the committee is off to a good start. There
needs to be an eye kept on the downtown designation. Devon Fuller stated now
that the ordinance and the mission statement have been completed, the Executive
Committee will talk to Jamie Stewart of REDC. Mr. Fuller questioned what action
is required from the Select Board to set up the Committee. Mr. Baker stated the
Board had authorized a Committee open to the public and designated an Executive
Committee to do that.
Motion by Devon
Fuller/Mitch Pearl to formalize the standing committee to be called the Brandon
Area Economic Development Committee that will consist of the initial five people
on the adhoc committee.
Mitch
Pearl respects the views of the Committee and he wants to make sure it is not
premature to move from an adhoc committee. Devon Fuller stated he has sent out
emails to obtain information and the Committee will design and create what it
needs as it goes along. He noted there is a need for a standing committee and
also to have access to a budget.
Richard
Baker stated it is reasonable to establish a committee and keep the five
original people as a steering committee. He stated initially they will need four
or five members and if they find an adhoc committee is needed, it would be up to
the Committee to determine this. Mitch Pearl stated the names of the committee
members, along with specified terms, needs to be brought back to the Select
Board for authorization. A recommendation was made to have an Executive Economic
Development Committee consisting of Lynn Saunders, Janet Mondlak, Bernie Carr,
Devon Fuller and Jim Leary. Jim Leary stated he was under the impression there
will be an opportunity to develop subcommittees. He felt different people could
work on where their interests lie.
Richard
Baker stated the Committee has recommended the Select Board add to the town
budget for an anticipated full-time Economic Development Director as of July 1,
2010. There will be a public hearing held and the by-laws will be amended as of
the February 8th meeting.
Richard
Baker stated relative to Item 2, there is no formal approval required by the
Select Board and if the Committee identifies someone to support their needs,
they could discuss this with Mr. Arlund to make it happen. Relative to Item 3,
Mr. Baker asked if this item is over and above the full-time person. Devon
Fuller advised this is a minimum pledge.
Richard
Baker stated the Committee has recommended a minimum of $50,000.00 per year
starting July 1st for five years. Devon Fuller also agreed to
continue to be a liaison to this Committee.
10.
Citizen's Public Forum
Maurice
Racine requested a report on the economic development funds as to how much has
been spent, what remains and how the remainder is intended to be spent. Keith
Arlund will provide the figures to Devon Fuller. Mr. Racine stated there had
been a $50,000.00 grant received for the expansion of broadband and he would
like to know how much of this grant has been spent and how much more interest
and broadband has been obtained. Keith Arlund stated the system is in place
with a few subscribers and the service is available. Mr. Racine stated there
already was Internet capability in town and Mr. Arlund advised this is for
wireless, not a hard line system. Keith Arlund stated this is a tie-in system
and there are commercial firms that have subscribed to it. Mr. Arlund will
provide a report on this subject at a subsequent meeting. George Reilly
questioned how many subscribers there are. Mr. Arlund stated he did not have the
figure on how many subscribers there currently are, however, the equipment the
grant paid for is operational and paid for, with the underlying reason for doing
this to provide better connectivity. Mr. Reilly stated if investing the
taxpayers' money was going to improve Internet service, he is curious how much
improvement has been made to the availability in town. Keith Arlund stated he
will provide additional information on this subject at a future meeting.
Motion by Kellie
Martin/Mitch Pearl to recess the Select Board at 9:40PM to convene as the Board
of Liquor Commissioners. The motion passed unanimously - 3 to zero.
The
Select Board reconvened at 9:44PM.
Motion by Kellie
Martin/Mitch Pearl to enter into executive session at 9:45PM to include the Town
Manager and Chief Brickell to discuss a personnel matter. The motion passed
unanimously - 3 to zero.
12. Adjournment
Motion by Kellie
Martin/Mitch Pearl to adjourn the Select Board meeting at 10:17PM.
The motion passed unanimously - 3 to zero.
Recording Secretary
|