Brandon Select Board Meeting
February 22, 2010
NOTE:
These are
unapproved minutes, subject to amendment and/or approval at the subsequent board
meeting.
In Attendance:
Richard Baker, Kellie Martin, Mitch Pearl,
Devon Fuller, Bill Hatch
Also in Attendance:
Keith Arlund, Tom Schmelzenbach, Ethan
Swift, Linda Stewart, Jeff Stewart, Chris Brickell, Maurice Racine, Norm
Maillot, Lee Kahrs, Phyllis Reed, Helyn Anderson
1. Call to order
The meeting was called to
order at 7:21PM by Chair Bill Hatch.
a) Agenda Adoption
Motion
by Mitch Pearl/Kellie Martin to adopt the
agenda as presented. The motion passed unanimously - 4 to zero.
3. Fiscal
a) Warrant -
February 22, 2010 - $1,005,522.70
b) Warrant - Kellogg
Deposit - $13,500
c) Warrant - Postage
- $2,000
d) Purchase Order:
#51042 - Univar USA - Flake Chloride
e) Purchase Order:
#51045 - Tenco - Sweeper Rental
Motion
by Mitch Pearl/Richard Baker to approve the
February 22nd warrant in the amount of
$1,005,522.70. The motion passed unanimously
- 4 to zero.
Mitch Pearl noted this
amount includes the quarterly payment to the school districts.
Motion
by Kellie Martin/Mitch Pearl to approve the
February 22nd warrant in the amount of
$13,500.00 for the Kellogg deposit for the
Brandon Police Department building. The motion passed unanimously - 4 to
zero.
It was noted this
represents the deposit on the contingent sales agreement.
Motion
by Mitch Pearl/Kellie Martin to approve the
February 22nd warrant in the amount of
$2,000.00 for postage. The motion passed
unanimously - 4 to zero.
Motion
by Mitch Pearl/Devon Fuller to approve the
Purchase Order #51042 to Univar USA for flake chloride. The motion passed
unanimously - 4 to zero.
Motion
by Mitch Pearl/Kellie Martin to approve the
Purchase Order #51045 to Tenco for the sweeper rental. The motion passed
unanimously - 4 to zero.
Kellie Martin reported
there will be a meeting for the 5th and 6th grade parents
regarding fund raising for the Boston and Montreal field trips. They are short
of funds and this is a follow-up meeting to figure out if they are going to have
enough money to do the trips or develop an alternative plan.
Ms. Martin advised voting
starts at 7AM on Tuesday, March 2nd in the Neshobe gym and will end
at 7PM. Project Liberty, which is a program sponsored by the Brandon Lions Club
and under the direction of John Kerr, will be continued this year.
Neshobe 6th
grade students; Emma Cijka, James Kennedy, Keegan LaRock, Ann Manning, Amy Jones
and Andrew Patten will be asking voters questions about the U.S. Constitution
and handing out copies of the document. Coffee will again be available at Town
Meeting and during voting, compliments of the Neshobe PTO. The Neshobe School
budget information brochures were mailed today. She noted the School Board and
Administration struggled to maintain a high quality education for the students
while minimizing the impact on the voters. If there are any questions on the
information, people can contact any member of the School Board or Judi Pulsifer.
Ms. Martin wished to
congratulate the Neshobe Geography Bee Team of Emma Cijka, Cameron Lewis, Nick
Kratky, Victoria Carrigan, David Forrest, Sean Martin and Garrett Welch.
Congratulations also go to Sean Martin, the Neshobe Geography Bee winner, who
will advance to the state Geography Bee that will take place at Middlebury
College in the spring. Mr. Sharrow is the Geography Bee coach and it was noted
he does a wonderful job.
Neshobe School is
celebrating "February's I Love Reading and Writing Month". Ms. Martin reported
Parent/Teacher conferences are scheduled for March 11th and 18th.
The PTO will be providing dinner for the staff. The school newsletter will be
going out the end of this week.
Mitch Pearl reported the OV
Walking Stick Theatre will be performing One-Act Plays on March 4th,
5th and 6th.
5.
Town Manager's Report
Tom
Schmelzenbach had provided information to the Board via email. He noted the
purchase orders were addressed under Item 3. He stated that a snow storm is
anticipated Tuesday or Wednesday and he encouraged people to use caution in
their commutes.
8. Consider Conflict of
Interest Policy
Motion
by Richard Baker/Kellie Martin to adopt the VLCT Conflict of Interest policy as
the Town of Brandon's Conflict of Interest policy.
Devon Fuller felt the Code
of Conduct the town currently has should be maintained if an ordinance is not
going to be developed. An ordinance would have a little more bite to it, but as
far as a policy, the Code of Conduct appears adequate and he does not see the
need to change it. Kellie Martin stated she is in favor of the policy as it
holds not just this group but every employed, volunteered or elected person
somewhat accountable for their actions. She does not think it is a bad idea to
spell out what the expectations are for people who are appointed to the various
Boards and Committees. She stated after reading through many, she did mark
various sections and she feels it could be massaged a bit. Mitch Pearl noted the
motion was to adopt the model Conflict of Interest policy from VLCT and he
questioned where Devon's referenced Code of Conflict originated from. Richard
Baker stated the existing one was developed when Brandon Godfrey was Town
Manager in the early 1990's and is a plain generic document. Mitch Pearl agreed
with Kellie Martin, given the age of the current Code of Conduct, that adopting
a new one now makes sense, but the model policy would require some wordsmithing.
He has seen a lot of Conflict of Interest policies and he cautioned if one is
not careful with what is said, there could be problems. He is essentially in
favor of adopting a slightly revised version of the VLCT model. Richard Baker
stated he would initially agree with Devon that the rules of the State of
Vermont are clear, but in view of recent circumstances, most of the community is
not clear with the rules and this would provide an explanation of the
expectations and if citizens have questions, they would have a document to
reference. Devon Fuller prefers the ordinance over the policy due to the
addition of an Ethics Board. His understanding is the employees are covered in
the employee handbook and the union employees are covered under the union
contract and if the Board is looking at covering all the boards and the
employees who are not under contract, having an ordinance would have more
substance to it. Mr. Fuller stated he is advocating an ordinance over a policy.
Richard Baker stated the Board has an old document and there should be an
upgrade and a new baseline to operate from. Bill Hatch was in favor of a policy
over an ordinance, as he sees potential abuse with a group of citizens acting as
an Ethics Board, whereby a citizen can bring an issue to the Ethics Committee
and that Committee would be empowered to sanction a public official and he
disagrees with the concept. Kellie Martin stated by having a policy enacted, it
requires everyone to follow it. Richard Baker stated for those few towns that
have an ordinance, they are tailored for specific issues in that town, but the
VLCT policy is more generic and could be fine-tuned. Mitch Pearl sees some of
the concerns the Chair has and he does believe that some sort of an Ethics
Committee could be developed, but he has issues with the extent of the authority
that the Committee would have. He stated there are legal matters that would need
to be considered and could be significantly abused and result in waste of a lot
of time and resources that would be better spent elsewhere. Keith Arlund stated
the union contract and the personnel policies cover the employees. The union
contract is updated every three years and there are rules that are in the
contract that must be followed. There are areas that include police conduct and
the personnel matters and disciplinary matters are dealt with by the Town
Manager. Bill Hatch suggested tabling the motion and having Kellie Martin take
the lead in cleaning up the VLCT model, with input provided by each of the board
members. A draft model of the policy could then be discussed at a future
meeting.
Motion
by Richard Baker/Mitch Pearl to table the motion to adopt the Conflict of
Interest policy until the meeting of March 22nd. The motion passed
unanimously - 4 to zero.
Mitch Pearl stated he would
work with Kellie Martin on revising this policy. Ethan Swift noted the Planning
Commission has an adopted Code of Conduct that they use and is available on the
web site. Richard Baker noted if the proposed policy were to be adopted, it
would be town-wide and would take precedence over any subsidiary boards'
policies that have been previously adopted. Phyllis Reed noted the DRB also has
a Code of Conduct policy as well.
9. Consider Interim
Zoning Bylaws
Motion
by Richard Baker/Mitch Pearl to sever the two sections that were warned and
previously discussed in the hearing.
The motion passed
unanimously - 4 to zero.
Motion
by Mitch Pearl/Kellie Martin to adopt Section 501(d) of the Brandon Land Use
Ordinance. The motion passed unanimously - 4 to zero.
Motion
by Richard Baker/Devon Fuller to adopt Section
112 of the Brandon Land Use Ordinance with the technical adjustment of moving
the phrase "including any clearing or preparation of the land" to immediately
following the word "development".
Motion
by Richard Baker/Mitch Pearl to table the motion to adopt Section 112 of the
Brandon Land Use Ordinance until the March 22nd meeting.
Mitch Pearl thinks the
intent is good and he will assist with the redrafting of it. Richard Baker
stated if we can agree upon it on the 22nd, it can be adopted at that
time, or it could be returned back to the Planning Commission for further
rewrite. Mitch Pearl noted he will do a revision and forward it back to the
Planning Commission for their approval. If it is felt that the changes are
within the intent of the Planning Commission, it can be debated and taken up at
that meeting.
The motion passed
unanimously - 4 to zero.
10. Old/Other Business
Richard Baker reported
there was a final working session at the Stephen A. Douglass House of the Hawk
Hill Management Committee, with the intention of submitting a grant application
for up to $10,000.00. The applicant will be Moosalamoo and OV will act as the
fiscal agent. He noted since this is the Board's last meeting before the grant
deadline, he would like to request that the Town Manager write a letter of
support for this grant.
Motion
by Richard Baker/Kellie Martin to authorize the
Town Manager to write a letter of support for the grant application for the Hawk
Hill Management Committee. The motion passed unanimously - 4 to zero.
11. Citizens Public
Forum
Helyn Anderson stated she
had two public works issues to discuss. She noted in October, she had brought to
the Board's attention a highly dangerous situation in Forestdale that was
created by a cut in the sidewalk. Anyone riding a bike or walking in this area
that was not familiar with this section could have a bad fall. She noted this
has not been repaired and she suggests that a simple sewer plate bolted to the
sidewalk to provide a continuous surface would rectify the matter. Ms. Anderson
also provided pieces of the sidewalk from Park Street that have been ripped up
by the sidewalk plow. She suggested the purchase of snow blowers that would not
break up the pavement. She also requested that the crosswalks be plowed out so
that people can get across the street.
Maurice Racine questioned
if there has been any progress on the Backyard Project since the last meeting.
Tom Schmelzenbach advised he met with Jim Carroll last week and there are a
couple of questions that VTrans has asked and Jim Carroll is working on them at
this time.
Mr. Racine wished to thank
Mr. Arlund for the information on the wireless Internet. He noted he called APC,
who is the provider, and talked with Bob Ferguson. He asked if there is only a
transmitter on the Brandon Inn. Mr. Arlund advised there is also a transmitter
on the Grandpa's Knob tower and he noted this system is a line-of-site
situation. Mr. Racine asked the vendor for a document with some depiction and
Mr. Ferguson has provided Mr. Racine with a person to contact. Mr. Racine
requested Mr. Arlund's help in this matter. Mr. Arlund stated there had been
potential sites that did not work out for various reasons, due to the
line-of-sight requirement. Maurice Racine questioned if all of the $50,000.00
had been spent and Mr. Arlund advised there is about $3,000.00 to $4,000.00
remaining for maintenance costs.
Maurice Racine was also
interested in the conflict of interest conversation and he agrees there is a
Conflict of Interest policy, but Mr. Fuller was alluding to an ordinance and he
strongly encouraged the Select Board to reconsider the approval of an ordinance.
He noted with a policy, the Board can choose to abide by it if they want to, but
an ordinance puts the power back to the people. Phyllis Reed also agrees with
Mr. Racine and she would encourage the Board to adopt an ordinance. She stated
as a member of the DRB, she cannot understand why the DRB and the Planning
Commission have to abide by a code of ethics, but the Select Board does not have
one. Mitch Pearl stated he takes the issue of conflict very seriously as an
attorney and the DRB and Planning Commission both act as a quasi judicial board.
Mitch Pearl stated that some people come here with agendas and this issue came
up at the last meeting and this is the first time that this type of issue has
been brought up with this Board. He stated if the Board adopts a policy, it
would be a step in the right direction, but Mr. Racine is strongly in favor of
an ordinance, and Mr. Pearl wanted to know why he feels so strongly about this
and why it is such an issue. Mr. Pearl questioned what the underlying issue was.
Mr. Pearl stated if it is felt the Board is not doing their job, he would like
to know the specifics. Phyllis Reed stated this is nothing personal but she is
concerned they are operating with no code of ethics and she was surprised to
find this out at the last meeting. Richard Baker stated the Board has a code of
ethics and the members are ethical people. Phyllis Reed hoped that all of the
Board members are working with a clear conscience. Devon Fuller noted he is
working for the community and is not working for personal gain. Mitch Pearl
stated that conflict of interest does not arise in an abstract and if there is a
conflict of interest, it is with a particular issue. Phyllis Reed stated it is
clear that the conflict of interest stands with Richard Baker and a developer.
Mitch Pearl questioned what Ms. Reed wanted Mr. Baker to do and she noted that
when Jack McKernon was on the Select Board, he removed himself from the Board
due to a development issue. It was noted that this was Mr. McKernon's choice,
but he was not required to. Richard Baker stated this is the reason he is
adamant the Select Board should have a Conflict of Interest policy and it should
be handled in a clear forum. Kellie Martin stated Article 7 of the VLCT draft
policy goes over how it is enforced and she has read through this document
multiple times and she does not see a problem with it, as this Board meets every
standard and requirement. She stated that everyone has recused themselves when
there has been a proceeding that may be deemed a conflict of interest. Mitch
Pearl stated that the conflict of interest occurs over a specific issue or
decision that the Board has to make. Mr. Pearl stated there have been a lot of
innuendos, but no one has come forward to discuss specifics where the Board did
not move forward properly. Mr. Racine stated the draft ordinance he submitted to
the Board has a Citizen's Committee that would review a conflict of interest and
the citizens would be passing judgment on it. He stated we have a Board member
who was asked to remove himself from the Board and Mr. Baker chose not to do so.
Mitch Pearl noted under state law, a Citizen's Committee could not remove an
elected official. Mr. Racine stated the Select Board should be accountable to
the citizens of the town. Mr. Racine stated that he does not have an issue with
Mr. Baker, just some of his actions, as he does not care about Mr. Baker as an
individual. Mitch Pearl questioned what action Richard Baker had taken that was
a conflict of interest. Maurice Racine felt that his authority over town
employees presented a conflict and his position on the board overall is a
conflict of interest over everything and recusing himself from a particular
issue is not enough. Mitch Pearl stated he has not heard any particular action
or decision made by Mr. Baker or this Board that Mr. Racine can specifically
provide.
Linda Stewart stated in the
Board's consideration, they may be comfortable with the current members,
however, these same people are not always going to be the Board, but the policy
should be developed to be carried forward.
Mr. Hatch stated this
discussion was out of order as there had already been a motion to table the
discussion of this item to a subsequent meeting.
Sue Gage stated relative to
the discussion of Section 112, she noted that there are sometimes permitting
issues with the state that hinder people from moving forward with their projects
and this should be considered in their discussion.
Motion
by Richard Baker/Kellie Martin to recess as the Select Board to reconvene as the
Board of Liquor Commissioners at 8:41PM. The motion passed unanimously - 4 to
zero.
The Select Board reconvened
at 8:46PM.
Motion
by Richard Baker/Kellie Martin to enter into executive session at 8:47PM to
include the Town Manager to discuss a litigation matter. The motion passed
unanimously - 4 to zero.
The Board came out of
Executive Session at 9:25PM. There were no actions required.
11. Adjournment
Motion
by Richard Baker/Kellie Martin to adjourn the Select Board meeting at 9:30PM.
The motion passed unanimously - 4 to zero.
Recording Secretary
|